| Date |
Initials |
Comments |
| 18/08/08 |
LG |
You moaners about noise are such idiots. If the "noise" of people
enjoying themselves (ie music from festivals - people bringing trade to
your community, aeroplanes, etc.) is too much for you, why not consider
relocating to say New Zealand where there aren't so many people. The
countryside does not belong solely to you. I concur with PC, because my
own father fought for six years so that you could enjoy living in
England's green and pleasant land. You don't own it just because you've
bought a big house on your retirement. And yes, it will just serve you
right if, as I write, central government have their eye on this "space"
to house many of the newcomers to our Country who need asylum centres,
houses, schools, hospitals, etc. etc. They can't all stay in London, we
know that, so don't be surprised when they come to a field near you.
Also, Devon is having a rubbish burning power station. How do you fancy
one? They have to build them somewhere. |
| 26/04/06 |
PC |
I have been working on a job near Brize Norton as a heating engineer and
have enjoyed both watching and listening to the military aircraft take
off, circle and land these guys need to practice to keep their skills
and the various troop and equipment movement. You live in an area of
outstanding beauty, why? because men of the first and second world wars
defended this country so you can have the privilege of living where you
do. I feel a great sense of pride watching these planes and would gladly
swap my quiet house for one of yours. remember the battle of Britain. |
| 11/04/06 |
VQ |
I must say - this forum is rather pathetic and tedious to read. It
strikes me that several people in South Cerney have 'Victor Meldrew'
syndrome. Could it be that you have too much time on your hands and need
something to moan about? You should be grateful that you have the Army
as your neighbours. I find an immense amount of comfort and security
knowing my neighbouring Barracks shadow me. I'd certainly rather keep
them with their aircraft, weekend gliders and parachutists then say - a
housing estate! Forgive me, but I thought there was a great British
tradition of being neighbourly. Unfortunately, the few minority in this
forum don't give that sense to the village of South Cerney. Ironically
we were the only household in our area to support new weekend activity
on this site and since then we've been invited to several open days,
flight and barbeques as a result. It pays to be welcoming! When the new
season starts consider this - our barracks were braining storming ideas
for what to do on their site at the weekends. So far drive-in-movies and
funfairs have come in to play! Consider yourselves lucky. Anyway, my
real reason for being on this site. I have recently moved to the area
and started work in an Estate Agents. Not knowing the area I began
internet searches for the surrounding villages. I'm extremely
disappointed with the sense of community in your area and I find it
difficult to promote the place to any house hunts - plane fanatics or
not. |
| 12/11/05 |
SS |
Blimey ..still whingeing about a few little props.. you want to be under
the Luton flight path, and they are building another runway to give us
20% more noise to boot, the 'against another runway' group say that last
year we had over 50,000 flights over our patch...my own family,
well...we are lucky that it doesn't bother us one iota really.. We've
lived with the sound of aircraft all our lives, obviously not everyone
is like us ..hence the 'anti new runway group' albeit Luton airport has
been busy for years.. but it sort of puts things in perspective. |
| 09/11/05 |
LA |
Maybe you have tinnitus. Planes fly, they buzz, they zoom, they roar.
They have done since the concept of air flight was introduced into the
modern world. Why not move to somewhere like Cumbria or Northumberland,
there's no need for RAF sites there, and so hopefully you shall find
peace and quiet. The planes from Brize will be back there soon, and I
have to say, I shall rather miss them, spotting the planes that my mum
said she flew in when her father was in the RAF, and indeed, when my
father was alive, flying off to do important work. I know that civilians
jumping out of planes isn't particularly important, but if, like a lot
of them are, they are doing charity jumps, all the better. Having had my
father pass away just over a month ago from cancer, I can safely say
that I would encourage any means possible to raise money for development
into cancer research and funding for treatment. |
| 03/11/05 |
GW |
The main issue is with the "buzzing" of the plane that ruins the
peaceful atmosphere of the Cotswolds. I am hoping that the military
planes will soon be back at Brize Norton (equally ruining the peace) but
my issue is with the annoying buzzing plane heard not just in South
Cerney. |
| 02/11/05 |
Maurice McKee
Parish Council Clerk |
The Parish Council has discussed the aircraft noise
generated by the activities at Duke of Gloucester Barracks on numerous
occasions. The Chairman attended the recent meeting of the liaison group
and made an agreed statement on behalf of the Parish Council which will
be available when the Minutes of the October meeting have been agreed.
At the forthcoming November Parish Council meeting the Chairman will
give a report on the liaison meeting he attended which again will be
available in December after those Minutes have been agreed.
I don’t think that the Parish Council should become
involved in the Forum discussion per se. It (the PC) uses its meetings
for such activities and the public are invited to attend and can
contribute with the permission of the Chairman. It is a delicate matter
whether to suppress genuine criticism, on the web site, of its (the PC)
decisions without defending its position but on the other hand it is the
elected representatives who take decisions and the place to object is
either at the ballot box or ask the Chairman’s permission to make a
statement at one of the PC meetings. |
| 29/10/05 |
|
Perhaps GW could clarify the question raised on 27th as it seems to ask
from where the military planes are taking off and that the question is
separate to the observation regarding the smaller aircraft used for
parachuting. |
| 28/10/05 |
|
GW does not refer to noise from " heavy transport planes"; he/she
specifically asks about the "annoying buzzing" of "THE PARACHUTE PLANE
THAT CONSTANTLY CIRCLES THE AREA" |
| 28/10/05 |
|
The Ministry of Defence has confirmed that the parachuting is not
undertaken solely by the military or indeed solely by members of 29th
Regiment. Anyone can parachute from the airfield by simply booking and
paying. Civilians parachute from the airfield all the time - this is not
"military" in any sense. |
| 28/10/05 |
M.S. |
Yes, your Parish Council did write to MOD to support the on going
flying at South Cerney and to recommend that the Liaison Group was
considered to be unnecessary. However, I, as Chairman, represented
this parish at that meeting where I presented a prepared statement on
behalf of the Parish Council. That statement had been discussed and
unanimously agreed by Council at the October meeting. A full copy of
the document will be available after the November meeting and will be
included on the website. South Cerney Parish Council fully supports
the activities carried on by the Royal Logistic Corps including the
parachuting by the Silver Stars which are wholly and solely part of 29
Regt RLC.
Anyone requiring details of what was discussed at the Liaison Meeting
will be able to see a copy of the minutes in due course. In the
meantime, Mr Ray Brassington of the Cotswold District Council will be
able to discuss all questions relating to this situation
|
| 27/10/05 |
|
The noisy, heavy military aircraft referred to by GW are most probably
RAF Transport planes, VC10s, Tri-Star's etc currently flying from RAF
Fairford as the runways at RAF Brize Norton are being resurfaced. Contrary to the statement made in the previous letter,
parachutists of the Silver Stars do not use heavy transport planes |
| 26/10/05 |
|
Visitors to this site may be interested to know that the South Cerney
Parish Council has recently sent a letter to the army supporting the
parachuting activities carried out from the airfield. If this does not
reflect your views, you should contact the parish council at the address
on this web site. The Council also criticised the establishment of a
liaison group between the local community and the army aimed at trying
to reach constructive solutions to the problems of noise caused by
commercial parachuting . The answer to GW is that the noise is caused by
recreational and commercial parachuting groups which operate from the
airfield in South Cerney. |
| 28/09/05 |
|
Have people considered the alternatives if the airfields were closed??
Wouldn't it be great if they were all turned into refugee centres? |
| 27/09/05 |
GW |
I have discovered that no matter where one lives in this part of the
Cotswolds one cannot get away from the annoying "buzzing" of the
parachute plane that constantly circles the area - where are the loud
military aircraft coming from - Fairford or Brize Norton?? Does anyone
know?? |
| 22/09/05 |
LA |
HS, I feel you are blowing things out of proportion. I am certainly not
a towny and have lived in cities/towns for all of 4 years. It seems
you're luck isn't getting much better now that Brize Norton air traffic
is now 'disrupting the beautiful serenity of a place that used to be a
very useful RAF site.' I do think you need to get your priorities right-
a tiny prop plane bears no resemblance to other major issues involved in
real life. Get over yourself or move away if you don't like it. I don't
like the sound a bird makes. Makes me cry, I shall complain to the
Times. GIVE IT UP. |
| 27/07/05 |
|
All those who like me are really distressed by the volume and duration
of noise should contact Ray Brassington at the Cotswold District Council
and Geoffrey Clifton Brown at the Houses of Parliament. The debate is
between the private company running a business at the airfield and the
people who are suffering as a result. |
| 11/06/05 |
HS |
No ! It might be insignificant to L A, especially as I see, you lived in
Swindon and Bristol. That doesn't mean you are a Towny, but it might. So
perhaps the noise issue is unlikely to worry you. Good for you. I see
that quite a lot of people who, shall we say, are transitory residents
here are pro parachuting and can't see the problem and don't care. The
plane taking off doesn't bother me either (although my commiseration's
for those who live in South Cerney and have to put up with the noise).
It's what it does after it has taken off that bothers me. And as for TS;
don't presume that most of us fly. What S Cerney has, is certainly not a
gnat's whisper. It is a persistent loud annoyance which is disruptive to
residents over a wide area. It's the duration of the noise that annoys.
Wouldn't it be nice if some of the comments from the 'parachute
supporters club' were a little sympathetic to what is a real and
distressing problem for people like me. |
| 19/05/05 |
LA |
I haven't lived in South Cerney for a long time at all, roughly a year,
and I have seen no reason to complain about a couple of planes going up
every now and again. It's an airfield. Like any other. But the only
difference is, that it's still being used even though the R.A.F. left
it- at least it's not a waste land, with no use. If there are people
learning to parachute, surely that would bring revenue to the area? If
people do an activity such as that they would need somewhere to stay. I
really don't know what the fuss is about. I live practically right under
the flight path, and I'm not bothered. It really is a petty argument-
just think this could be Swindon or Bristol (places where I have lived
in the past) we could be dealing with shootings and gang warfare. An
aeroplane is pretty insignificant, no? |
| 24/04/05 |
TS |
The objectors are the ones I can't fathom. Most people, including
objectors, fly somewhere for whatever reason and I just wonder if they,
as passengers, ever sympathise as they pass over the buildings below
about the real noise they are making, every day. All day + some night
flying, I doubt it. What Cerney has is a gnat's whisper against busy
airports & forces airfields! |
| 16/04/05 |
HS |
I see the 'essential parachute training' season is upon us again. It's
interesting to read the comments of those supporting this anti social
activity. Why do they do that I wonder ? They seem very eager to
maintain this noisy pursuit. Okay, why not introduce drag racing at
night when the airfield's not in use. Or endurance power boat racing on
the lakes. Since there has been so much noise since the 30's I am sure
all you right thinking people would support this little money spinner.
They just don't get it. If it didn't have such a detrimental affect on
the environment and quality of life for so many, many, people in the
Cotswolds, not just in South Cerney, we would care less about
parachuting. Let me suggest a worthwhile compromise; take the engine out
of the aircraft and I will stop complaining. If I allowed a private
company to start a parachuting school on my land I would have to obtain
planning permission. If I got it, it wouldn't hurt to bung a few quid at
charities, invite the mayor for a jump and even ask the army to join in
so I could say that it was essential training. Of course permission
would not be granted. I wonder why ? |
| 07/03/05 |
LR |
I was born in the village of South Cerney and still live there, and very
often sit in the garden of my home with my grandson and watch the
parachutes. I don't understand why, if you don't like it you stay here.
This is part of village life and always will be. |
| 19/02/05 |
Steve |
Ah.. so noise only matters where you live! NIMBYard syndrome really, the
relevance of Abingdon is that it was real noise from real 'meaty'
aircraft.. not dinky toys!, joking apart. I can tell you that many of
the outlying villages near H/Hempstead see it the same way as you, a
survey showed that most of them had actually been on the planes
themselves, ironic.. but they have to fly over someone! |
| 10/02/05 |
|
Who actually said anything about the People of Hemel Hempstead all
moving??!! All I said was that I couldn't see the relevance of Mr
Stockford commenting on how noise affects a place that he doesn't even
live in. How exactly does RAF Abingdon come into it??? Surely only
selfish people would put their own enjoyment above other peoples'? I
have never said that I wanted to stop all jumping - I merely felt that
there was room for compromise. |
| 19/12/04 |
Steve |
You wouldn't see the relevance because your biased against the jumpers.
My experiences have involved real noise in the country and in the town.
I'm the first to admit I was reared with the planes in RAF Abingdon's
heyday so the noise you talk of is to nothing to me, but lets face it,
its hardly ear shattering stuff in South Cerney! The people of Hemel
Hempstead can't all move away if they don't like it! They haven't any
choice! Surely only a selfish person would complain just to stop people
enjoying themselves! I'm supporting those who want to jump. If you can't
see the relevance of my experiences then ..too bad! |
| 13/12/04 |
JD |
Why exactly is Mr Stockford commenting? Living in Hemel Hempstead is
hardly the same as being a resident of South Cerney and quite frankly I
fail to see the relevance of his experiences. So, he doesn't mind
aircraft noise, good for him!! |
| 23/11/04 |
Steve Stockford |
In my recent comment 23/10/04 I forgot to mention I now live in Hemel
Hempstead, and we get the low flying traffic from Luton, from elsewhere
we regularly get a plane which passes over late at night with piercing
high pitched engines. Last week we had a Chinook which landed 1 mile
away. We've even had Concorde flying over and doing a sharp noisy climb.
I haven't heard anyone mention any noise for years!! Come to think of it
some of the South Cerney complainers may have flown over me. Good job it
doesn't bother me eh!! |
| 22/11/04 |
|
I suggest those who seek who shut down the 'non-military activity'
should just go and try a skydive themselves. THEN see if they still hold
the same opinion! |
| 23/10/04 |
Steve Stockford |
I was brought up amidst the noise of aircraft engines (mostly 4 engined
from RAF Abingdon). It would be music to my ears now, after all, they
were and still are the sounds of freedom. No one should be allowed to
forget that.. and freedom means being able to parachute.. Lets face it
the aircraft they use just aint that noisy'. Stop whinging!... Steve |
| 26/08/04 |
|
For the information of KHB, I am NOT a newcomer and I find the noise to
be a nuisance. The airfield has certainly been in continuous use,
despite the fact that it ceased to be an RAF station and was taken over
by the army quite some years ago, however it is only relatively recently
that the noise levels have reached nuisance level. Also, for the
information of KHB - these people are not merely raising money for
charity - that can be done quietly by submitting a direct debit. |
| 02/08/04 |
KHB |
South Cerney airfield has been in continuous use since the 1930's so, if
anybody moved here after that time surely they should have realised that
there would be aircraft in the area! Why all the fuss - or don't the
newcomers like to see people enjoying themselves and, in the process,
raising thousands of pounds for charity? |
| 08/07/04 |
The Marquis de derval et de Moisdon |
FOR THE INFORMATION OF LS ON MAY 8 2004 AND OTHER VISITORS TO THIS
FORUM. WHILST LS IS TELLING OTHERS TO "CHECK THE FACTS", HE SHOULD ALSO
DO EXACTLY THAT AND WOULD DISCOVER THAT I HAVE NEVER BEEN THE 'PATRON'
OF CIRENCESTER ACCESS GROUP. |
| 08/07/04 |
JP |
Yes, they are back with a vengeance. 11 days of continuous daily flying
during the last 14 days. Both the Silver Stars and the RAF 'box van'
have reneged on their announcements NOT to fly over South Cerney or
other local settlements by flying around and across the village. The
silver stars aircraft has been so low flying along Station Road that its
registration number could be read with the naked eye. The 'droning' is
back, no longer is the new aircraft quite when flying around and across
the village for up to 20 minuets at a time. Why have the pilot[s]
stopped flying away from the village to gain height? the aircraft has
more than enough power to carry out this flight plan. It amazes me that
so much rubbish can be written by others on this forum about the
problems of aircraft noise pollution. One can hardly believe that
LWW,KHB,LS & others actually reside in S. Cerney. The Parish Council
also appears to be completely out of touch with reality--nothing new
there, for those sceptics among you, when the Silver Stars are flying,
go out into your garden following the take off and watch the aircraft
flight pattern--this will prove who is right and who is wrong and
justifiable complains. Many residents of us in the Watermark complexes
are fed up with weekend after weekend being spoilt by aircraft noise.
The idiot who says move away if you do not like it just about sums up
the average commentator on this Forum, those with an ounce of common
sense write with correctness. We fully support the public petition which
we all signed |
| 05/07/04 |
LWW |
I moved to South Cerney 10 months ago; during the first month or so, yes
you could hear the planes, but now they are so quiet. It gives the local
people, and people from all over the country to enjoy skydiving. One of
the very few things available to South Cerney unless you like water
sports! The noise? What noise? We are directly along a flight path of
the planes; I don't even notice they are there unless I'm looking for
them. You just can't hear them. They support our village and the
neighbouring places. + I'm going skydiving soon! Something for the
villagers to do. If you don't like the unhearable noise then welcome to
leave. It's so hard to get houses within South Cerney; so count
yourselves lucky. There are many places worse then this to live in. This
is such a nice peaceful village. |
| 23/06/04 |
KHB |
As a South Cerney resident I now notice how quiet the new aircraft is
and have watched it climb out from the airfield in all directions.
Naturally, in order to let the parachutists land back at South Cerney it
will head back this way - and then land. It has yet to be seen circling
over one particular area "all day" - the pilot is well briefed to avoid
creating a noise pollution problem following the recent comments. Well
done to the Silver Stars for all the enjoyment that they give to people
- not to mention the enormous amount of money that they raise for
charity. |
| 11/05/04 |
HS |
I did check my facts....with a little man in Brize Norton air traffic
control and I beg to differ but anywhere within striking distance of S
Cerney is subject to this constant barrage of noise. Maybe South Cerney
residents are lucky because the plane leaves the immediate area when it
takes off, I don't know. I do know however that it flies north, south,
east and west of us and directly above. I call that circling ! I agree
on one point LS makes ~ The saga of aircraft noise is very tedious.
Interesting concept though; the new plane is faster so the noise is
less. No, I thought about that one and I still don't get it. Popping out
to get a life Just time to say thanks for your balanced, unbiased
opinion. |
| 08/05/04 |
LS |
Follow HS's comments on 29 April perhaps he or she should check the
facts. If so they would find that the regular flight pattern of the
parachute plane from South Cerney does not include the Coln
Valley, and come to that, they certainly don't 'circle all day' over
South Cerney. Yes they take off and land but the new plane attains
height at a far greater speed so the noise is less. The saga of
aircraft noise has become tedious (witness no letters on the subject
are printed in the Standard now) and are perpetuated by boring people
who need to get a life. Even the Mayor of Cirencester, Councillor
Nash, had a go at tandem jumping, raising in excess of £1,000 for
Cirencester Access for the Disabled, a very worthwhile cause, which,
incidentally has, as its 'Patron', none other than the Marquis de
Derval et de Moisdon, one of the main protagonists against the Silver
Stars Parachute Display Team. The Access Group also accepted a cheque
of £300 from Karl Williams, who owns the said aeroplane! Interesting
or what!
|
| 29/04/04 |
HS |
I didn't choose to live next to an airfield. I live on
the top of the Coln Valley. I chose to live and work in an area of rural
peace and tranquillity. Aircraft noise emanating from South Cerney
parachute planes is now so bad I can no longer enjoy weekends here and
ironically pray for bad weather to restrict flights ! Yes, parachute
planes come here and circle all day ! I find it extraordinary to read
that people are defending this anti social activity. What possible
interest could residents of S Cerney have in perpetuating this activity
? |
| 12/03/04 |
KHB |
The new aircraft is hardly audible - even when on the
golf course next door! |
| 28/02/04 |
GH
of Kemble |
What an excellent letter the Marquis wrote in the
Standard on the 26th February 2004, the contents were obviously
researched to such a degree that at long last something will be done
about the aircraft noise generally in the South Cotswolds |
| 23/02/04 |
|
Thanks to The Silver Stars for going to the unnecessary
enormous expense of purchasing a new quieter aircraft to satisfy a VERY
FEW wingers! |
| 27/10/03 |
KHB |
Thank
you to Mike Stuart, Chairman of the Parish Council, for his letter putting forward the
Council's view. It has always appeared to me that there are only two or three individuals
who are making all the fuss so I was not surprised to hear that Alan de Derval and his
opinion were outweighed at the Meeting. These few people seem determined to cause
disharmony in this friendly, lively village of ours. |
| 24/10/03 |
Mike Stuart
Chairman
S.Cerney
Parish Council |
Because of the increasingly vehement nature of the letters to the
press and on the web site Forum regarding the aircraft noise at South Cerney airfield, I
am obliged to comment on the situation.
It has been implied that the Parish Council and myself as Chairman have been biased and
unfair in our deliberations regarding the complaints from objectors to the noise from the
aeroplanes used to transport the parachutists. These implications I totally refute
At Parish Council meetings I have always endeavoured to take an even-handed approach when
chairing the debates regarding aircraft noise. Moreover,
I have made efforts to bring together the two parties concerned and to build bridges. Not only did I welcome Alan de Derval to speak at
the annual Parish Meeting but I arranged for representatives from the Army also to be
present. The resulting meeting was, I
thought, very useful and I was delighted to receive a letter from Alan stating that he was
grateful for my efforts. Furthermore, later
in the year I personally wrote to HQ LAND asking formally that all aeroplanes
dropping parachutists at South Cerney airfield should be obliged to keep to those rules
which now set the time and flight pattern restraints placed on the Silver Stars. All these facts can be confirmed by the minutes of
the Council. What will not be obvious from
those minutes was the excessive time that these debates took, nor will they show the
amount of feeling that was generated. In
particular, at the Annual Meeting, I found it very difficult to prevent Alan being
interrupted by those present, all of which, it appeared, were diametrically opposed to his
views.
South Cerney Parish Council members truly believe that the aircraft noise protesters are a
minority of the village population. This
belief is based on our own individual experiences and also the Village Appraisal. We do refer to that excellent document whenever
the need arises. We the Council, interpret
the Appraisal figures regarding the noise from parachuting completely contrary to the way
in which the objectors obviously do. We take
the percentage of 18% (220 out of 1,243) as being a small minority.
Furthermore, it is obvious that the objectors have misunderstood or misinterpreted another
question in the Appraisal, the one relating specifically to noise generated by Military
aircraft. Those of us who live here all
the week are fully aware that the majority of aircraft over-flying the village are
military aircraft not based at South Cerney and not the little ones seen and heard at
weekends. Also, when the data for the
Appraisal was collected in 1997, we had been subjected to several years of really
frightful noise from USAF KC 135 tankers flying out of RAF Fairford. That was, I believe, the reason for the inclusion
of the second question. For the objectors to now add the two sections together to claim
that over 500 people were opposed to the parachuting is absolutely inadmissible. We were
here in 1997, not all the present objectors were.
The current petition being organised by nameless individuals, confirms our reading of the
amount of support for the campaign to stop parachuting.
The sheets on display at the Post Office have less than forty names and some
of those are from people who do not reside in South Cerney. Granted the door-to-door
canvassing will result in more signatures, but had there been really strong opposition to
the current level of aircraft noise then surely there would have been very many more
signatures on the first attempt to raise support for the campaign?
There have been other debates in our community where the minority view has been expressed
the loudest. In such cases the Parish Council
feels a responsibility to ensure that the views of the quieter majority are given due
weight. The objectors contribution to the debate will continue to be given a full
hearing. I hope that everyone will understand
that the Parish Council feels it should continue to ensure that the apparent majority view
also be properly reflected. |
| 17/10/03 |
|
Living at the end of the village near to the air field I sometimes find
the noise to be annoying and invasive. I do however recognise the rights of others to
enjoy these activities, could a compromise be reached whereby these activities are
restricted to Mon thru Sat, leaving Sunday as a day of peace. |
| 16/10/03 |
MS |
When you live in the country you're bound to smell cows
If you live up in Gloucester you'll sometimes hear rows
If you live by a garage you'll surely smell oil
When you're by the allotment you'll smell Alan's soil
If you live near the Youth Club you'll get noisy kids
Doing things on their bikes like jumping and skids
If you live near the pools you will see funny houses
Where the men go to work and the girls wear the trousers
When you're missed by the postman its just when it rains
If you live on a floodplain you'll sometimes smell drains
On Thursday nights when they practice the bells
No one complains (like they do for the smells!)
Those who live by a pub on a Saturday night
They'll sometimes hear laughing and singing, all right
If you don't like the Cornish then don't use their tin
Those who don't like the townies should not drink their gin
It's a very long time since the airfields been there
If you hate parachuting, don't moan, live elsewhere. |
| 10/10/03 |
CM |
What a lovely cotswold village we live in. what noise? Is it just one end
of the village that hears it ? I haven't noticed it. We all moved to South Cerney and knew
what was around. We need visitors to support the pubs and resturants other wise it will be
a dead place like Down Ampney, and other places that have lost shops and pubs. |
| 10/10/03 |
DK |
They rattle my greenhouse. They scare our pets. Will they stop flying? I'm
not taking bets! But one thing rings true, with those planning dept pr***s I'd rather hear
aircraft than be looking at bricks. Use it or lose it, we've learnt to our cost. Put up
with a few planes, or the lot will be lost |
| 10/10/03 |
IR |
If it is a commercial venture does that mean someone is making a profit?
If so what charges are made for use of MOD land and the amenities thereon? |
| 09/10/03 |
|
The church bells example is a good one. If one lives next door to a church
one would expect the bells to be rung on a Sunday, perhaps for a practise during the week,
and on other odd occasions such as weddings. You wouldn't expect the church to be used by
a private profit making company which rang the church bells all day every day for money.
Such a change would quite reasonably be objected to. That is the situation here. If some
people don't hear or mind the noise then lucky them. They don't need to get involved - it
makes no difference either way.For those that do hear it the noise causes severe distress
and misery. It seems bizarre to actually want people to suffer for something that doesn't
bother you. |
| 09/10/03 |
|
Actually the vast majority of sky divers are not local - its a business
which has customers from all over. Take a look at www.skydivesouthwest.co.uk - you can see
what is going on quite clearly. To reiterate, its not the proper operational military
activity thats the problem - its this commercial and sport skydiving thats the issue. |
| 07/10/03 |
Ian Roberts |
When we moved to the villge twenty years ago the local airfied was used
for military parachuting during the week and by gliders at the week end.These gliders were
training craft used by the Air Training corps. The practice of parachuting grannies for
charity seems to have taken their place. For my part the military aspect is a just cause
and the noise asociated with the continuance of their training is a small price that we
have to pay for our freedom. I do appreciate the need to satisfy the needs of the
"activity sports people" and to this end could we not compromise by only flying
on Saturday and leaving Sunday free to allow the majority to enjoy the peace of the
country side. Could I also ask for a list of all the week-end parachutists along with
their connection to the military and also where they come from. I also wonder how many
live in the area. |
| 06/10/03 |
KHB |
RAF (as was) South Cerney was built and has been in constant use since the
1930's. Surely the time to object to aircraft noise was then and not now. If you have
moved into the area since then you are a bit too late to complain? |
| 02/10/03 |
KHB |
This is written in support of the air activity from the airfield. It is
fun to watch other people doing what I don't have the nerve to do! Some very brave people,
in my opinion, raise an awful lot of money for deserving charitable causes - which can't
be bad. It is depressing to see a few people make such a fuss about the noise. Now I see
that we have to put up with their brightly coloured posters blighting the village! |
| 27/09/03 |
NF |
The noise does not bother me in the slightest - I hadn't noticed it until
I started to read the debate! People today have more "lively" hobbies and
therefore should be allowed to be catered for without being moaned at by people who are
not interested in the same recreational ideas.Each to his own - it's not as if it's every
day |
| 27/09/03 |
DH |
Having read the comments of fellow villages concerning the subject of
aircraft noise pollution it would appear that the majority of those who have bothered to
comment adversly on the matter are not in possession of any factual and accurate data
concerning this matter. As a supporter of those who have been objecting to aircraft noise
pollution it should be remember that in the 1999 Village Appraisal, some 590 residents
objected to among other issues parachuting and aircraft noise. There is a considerable
difference to the limited military flying activity and the normal 16 hours of aircraft
noise pollution experienced 3 weekends out of 4 over South Cerney and other settlements.
Comments made by a certain individual concerning residency in South Cerney is typical foot
in mouth comments expected from him. |
| 26/09/03 |
|
As a recent incomer, I have an open mind, but also two observations: 1. I
suspect that the noise is far more noticeable in some types of house than others, hence
the variation in opinions. This feeling comes from having stayed in two different house
styles in the village. If as I suspect the problems are at night, then this would explain
why those in chalet style houses would be more likely to experience it. 2. It is obvious
that this noise/vibration (yes, I have experienced it) does seriously affect a number of
people, and that their opinions should be taken equally seriously. This is obviously not a
trivial matter for them. |
| 25/09/03 |
|
I haven't spoken to anyone yet who is worried about this noise. It seems
like we have a vociferous minority |
| 25/09.03 |
|
Just to let the Council know that there are many people in the village who
actually enjoy watching the parachuting. I do not notice the noise of the aircraft at all
- even when I am playing on the golf course next door! |
| 23/09/03 |
|
I find it quite distressing that the comments in the Forum page are
becoming quite vitriolic and personal towards 29 Regiment RLC. The Regiment is, after all,
part of this community. The current Commanding Officer has gone as far as he can in
listening to the demands of the few by restricting flying to 3 weekends in every 4 and
setting strict flying times for the Silver Stars (flight paths are dictated by the
prevailing wind and flight control at RAF Fairford and Brize Norton). The other aircraft
flying out of South Cerney (which, as has been stated on numerous occasions, is an active
military airfield) belong to the RAF and do not come under the Commanding Officer's
jurisdiction. I personally would like to apologise to the Regiment for the unfortunate
wording of some letters and points for the Forum page (ie 'bullying') from a minority of
villagers. |
| 19/09/03 |
|
Complaints about the noise from this anti social activity
have been recieved by the district council and the MoD from Preston, Cirencester,Ampney St
Mary, Coates , and Siddington. Is it suggested that all of these people should simply pack
up and go? I agree that if one lives near a military airfeild one should expect military
noise - and no one objects to noise of that type, This noise in entirely differenet in
quality and duration. I dont think that the people of this area should submit to this
bullying attitude. |
| 03/09/03 |
 Mr NJO Rees,
CS (Policy Secretariat) 1a Headquarters Land Command Erskine Barracks Wilton Salisbury
Wilts
SP2 0AG
|
Councillor Stuart
South Cerney Parish CouncilDear Councillor Stuart
1. Thank you for your letter of 12 August, addressed to Major Jones of 29 Regiment RLC,
about aircraft noise. I have been asked to reply. My apologies for the slight delay in
responding to your letter.
2. I am sorry to hear that the inhabitants of South Cerney are being disturbed by
aircraft noise. As you know, South Cerney is an authorised military airfield and as such
is utilised by a variety of military aircraft. As Major Bruce explained at the Annual
Parish meeting, an RAF Skyvan also makes use of the airfield at South Cemey, and this
additional activity may have prompted some of the complaints you have received.
3. As you have suggested, Major Jones has now written to the appropriate RAF
Headquarters that controls the movements of the Skyvan. He has requested that wherever
possible the Skyvan is restricted to operating within the weekend flying restrictions
accepted by the Silver Stars. Unfortunately, the Skyvan is sometimes used to train
Territorial Army personnel and the weekend is often the only time when they are available.
As a result it will not always be possible for them to abide by the strict regime put in
place by the Regiment. Having examined the flight records of the Skyvan, I have learnt
that they have only flown on four weekends this year and, conscious of the effect that
such flights can have locally, they are making every effort to keep their weekend flying
to an absolute minimum.
4. I can assure you that we take the concerns of your parishioners very seriously and
are very keen on reaching an acceptable compromise, by which the Silver Stars and others
can continue to fulfil their long standing training requirements, without unduly
inconveniencing the local populace.
5. I hope this is helpful.
Yours sincerely
N J O Rees |
| 17/07/03 |
Silver Stars |
Due to unforeseen circumstances the airfield will not be available for use
by the Silver Stars over the weekend 16/17 August, as noted in the Parish magazine.
Permission has therefore been granted for the Silver Stars to fly the following Saturday
and Sunday, 23/24 August |
| 12/07/03 |
Chairman
S.Cerney
P.Council
Rose Cottage
S.Cerney |
Major W I M Jones MBE RLC, Acting Commanding Officer
29 Regiment RLC, Duke of Gloucester Barracks
South Cerney, CIRENCESTER, Gloucestershire. GL7 5RD
Dear Major Jones
AIRCRAFT NOISE
South Cerney Parish Council has recently received complaints from inhabitants of our
village regarding aircraft noise at South Cerney.
At our recent Annual Parish Meeting we were informed by Major Ian Bruce that
the Silver Stars now follow restricted flight timings and flight patterns. However the
Parish Council understands that 29 Regiment RLC has no control over the flight timings and
flight patterns of other aircraft who use South Cerney airfield, including the RAF who, we
believe, use a Sky Van. Although those who attended the Annual Parish Meeting were made
aware of this situation this has obviously not filtered through to other members of the
Parish.
The Parish Council would appreciate it if 29 Regiment RLC could pass the
concerns of some of our parishioners up through the chain of command. They
would also appreciate it if a request could be made to the other users of
South Cerney airfield to comply with the flight restrictions accepted by the
Silver Stars.
The Parish Council would greatly appreciate your help in this matter.
Yours sincerely,
Michael Stuart. Chairman, South Cerney Parish Council |
| 07/07/03 |
|
I fail to see the difference between military and civilian flying. An
airfield is an airfield where there will always be flying of some sort or another. If you
don't like the sound of bells, you don't buy a house next door to a Church. If you don't
like the sound of merriment you don't buy a house next door to a pub. If you don't like
the sound of aircraft, then don't buy a house within a mile or so of an airfield. If you
do, then you can have no cause to complain. Try living close to Heathrow or Gatwick for a
while then you will find South Cerney is nothing to worry about. |
| 03/07/03 |
|
The addition of a civilian operator at South Cerney is the main cause of
the noise. They aquired a larger plane to replace the pink one (takes twice as many people
hence half the take offs and landings) and then allowed a civilian to bring his two bladed
prop small aircraft to the airfield. He has no military connection and operates as a
civilian business as he was today on a Thursday. |
| 13/06/03 |
|
There is no objection to military activity from the airfield. The
objection is to the commercial and recreational activity at the weekend, which
incidentally started only several years ago. There is no objection to jets, helicopters,
hercules, and other bona fide military aircraft. |
| 21/05/03 |
|
If you choose to live one mile from an airfield you have to be prepared to
live with aircraft noise. The current noise from flying is absolutely nothing compared to
what we had to put up with some fifty years ago with jets and helicopters regularly flying
and training here. |
| 03/02/03 |
|
There has been an indication that parachuting will take place from the
South Cerney airfield on three out of four weekends. The parachuting activity is not part
of any formal military training - it is a recreational sport for servicemen in their free
time and civilians who pay a fee. There is a great deal of noise which lasts throughout
the weekend, especially for households in the flight path. Villagers who suffer from this
noise should contact our local MP and the parish council. |